[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260122163149.GA1545062@kernel-ep2>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 22:01:49 +0530
From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<michael.chan@...adcom.com>, <sdf@...ichev.me>,
<almasrymina@...gle.com>, <dtatulea@...dia.com>,
<asml.silence@...il.com>, <dw@...idwei.uk>, <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] eth: bnxt: always set the queue mgmt ops
On 2026-01-22 at 21:06:43, Jakub Kicinski (kuba@...nel.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:34:20 +0530 Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> > > +
> > > + dev->queue_mgmt_ops = &bnxt_queue_mgmt_ops_unsupp;
> > > if (BNXT_SUPPORTS_QUEUE_API(bp))
> > > dev->queue_mgmt_ops = &bnxt_queue_mgmt_ops;
> > > - dev->request_ops_lock = true;
> >
> > Can we also mention that driver with queue_mgmt_ops set makes it as ops locked
> > driver in Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst ?
>
> Did you check if it's already documented there before asking me to do
> it? I know people don't read docs much but asking someone to document
> stuff that's already documented is a bit funny..
Okay it is there:
"Note that supporting struct netdev_queue_mgmt_ops automatically enables
"ops locking". "
Reviewed-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Thanks,
Sundeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists