netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v11 7/7] selftests: netconsole: validate target resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXJikx-Tt7XjHpl3@archlinux>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:51:18 +0000
From: Andre Carvalho <asantostc@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 7/7] selftests: netconsole: validate target
 resume

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:45:05PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> My main point is that even if we fix the HW setups to do the right thing
> in systemd policies - the tests are running against netdevsim, not the
> precious HW present on those setups.

This makes total sense. I got too carried away trying to make sense of why this
was failing (I might still submit a follow up to make the test more resilient).

> I don't remember the history, it's quite possible that Breno wanted to
> have a separate target for netcons from the start and I pushed back.
> I think we reached the point where we want to create a target.

Sounds good. I had a chat with Breno and I'll look into moving netconsole tests
to a standalone target.

Thanks for the patience and reviewing this series!

-- 
Andre Carvalho