lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXOXWWH7je3VKMn6@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:44:25 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: david.laight.linux@...il.com
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 05/14] ixgbevf: Use C test for PAGE_SIZE >
 IXGBE_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 02:57:22PM +0000, david.laight.linux@...il.com wrote:
> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
> 
> Compile-time tests being added to BIT() make it an 'integer constant
> expression' rather than a pre-processor expression for W=1 builds.
> 
> This means BIT() can't be used in pre-processor conditional that
> checks 'PAGE_SIZE > IXGBE_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD'.
> Change to use a normal 'if' statement, the compiler will optimise
> away the unwanted code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>

Thanks David,

Other than the motivation above, I appreciate that this removes two
#ifdefs, improving readability (subjective) and compile coverage
(objective) of this code.

As an aside: I'm Not sure what your merge plan is for this patchset, and
only it and the cover letter hit my inbox, so I'm missing context.  But
from a Networking PoV it seems that it could be sent as a stand-alone patch
to the iwl tree.

Regardless, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ