[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKaoeS0f7z_pjJhij8dFpgPPJfiWGsn25k6rgBUMUM4wiFHurA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:03:44 -0800
From: Rishikesh Jethwani <rjethwani@...estorage.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...dia.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
mbloch@...dia.com, borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
sd@...asysnail.net, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, leon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] tls: Add TLS 1.3 hardware offload support
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 5:48 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:28:48 -0700 Rishikesh Jethwani wrote:
> > - Rekey handling: HW offload key update (rekey) is not yet supported.
>
> Not sure this series will be merged without rekeying.
> We'll need to discuss pros and cons.
Rekey support is in [PATCH v5 2/3]. Split into a separate patch to
make review easier.
> > Testing
> > =======
> > Tested on Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx (Crypto Enabled).
> >
> > Both TX and RX hardware offload verified working with:
> > - TLS 1.3 AES-GCM-128
> > - TLS 1.3 AES-GCM-256
> > - Multiple KeyUpdate cycles (rekey)
> >
> > Test methodology: ktls_test : https://github.com/insanum/ktls_test/tree/master
> >
> > Please review and provide feedback.
>
> Selftests are a hard requirement, I already shared a link with more
> info with you.
I will run the existing TLS selftests to verify no regressions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists