[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577e3218-abca-413b-b9a7-fb8bac60b22d@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:55:25 -0800
From: "Creeley, Brett" <bcreeley@....com>
To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>,
Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>, Li Li <boolli@...gle.com>,
Anjali Singhai <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
emil.s.tantilov@...el.com
Subject: Re: [iwl-net PATCH] idpf: change IRQ naming to match netdev and
ethtool queue numbering
On 1/23/2026 12:40 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> The code uses the vidx for the IRQ name but that doesn't match ethtool
> reporting or netdev naming, this makes it hard to tune the device and
> associate queues with IRQs. Sequentially requesting irqs starting from
> '0' makes the output consistent.
>
> Before:
>
> ethtool -L eth1 tx 1 combined 3
>
> grep . /proc/irq/*/*idpf*/../smp_affinity_list
> /proc/irq/67/idpf-Mailbox-0/../smp_affinity_list:0-55,112-167
> /proc/irq/68/idpf-eth1-TxRx-1/../smp_affinity_list:0
> /proc/irq/70/idpf-eth1-TxRx-3/../smp_affinity_list:1
> /proc/irq/71/idpf-eth1-TxRx-4/../smp_affinity_list:2
> /proc/irq/72/idpf-eth1-Tx-5/../smp_affinity_list:3
>
> ethtool -S eth1 | grep -v ': 0'
> NIC statistics:
> tx_q-0_pkts: 1002
> tx_q-1_pkts: 2679
> tx_q-2_pkts: 1113
> tx_q-3_pkts: 1192 <----- tx_q-3 vs idpf-eth1-Tx-5
> rx_q-0_pkts: 1143
> rx_q-1_pkts: 3172
> rx_q-2_pkts: 1074
>
> After:
>
> ethtool -L eth1 tx 1 combined 3
>
> grep . /proc/irq/*/*idpf*/../smp_affinity_list
>
> /proc/irq/67/idpf-Mailbox-0/../smp_affinity_list:0-55,112-167
> /proc/irq/68/idpf-eth1-TxRx-0/../smp_affinity_list:0
> /proc/irq/70/idpf-eth1-TxRx-1/../smp_affinity_list:1
> /proc/irq/71/idpf-eth1-TxRx-2/../smp_affinity_list:2
> /proc/irq/72/idpf-eth1-Tx-3/../smp_affinity_list:3
>
> ethtool -S eth1 | grep -v ': 0'
> NIC statistics:
> tx_q-0_pkts: 118
> tx_q-1_pkts: 134
> tx_q-2_pkts: 228
> tx_q-3_pkts: 138 <--- tx_q-3 matches idpf-eth1-Tx-3
> rx_q-0_pkts: 111
> rx_q-1_pkts: 366
> rx_q-2_pkts: 120
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index c2a1fe3c79ec..c1f8dfc570ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -4093,7 +4093,7 @@ static int idpf_vport_intr_req_irq(struct idpf_vport *vport,
> continue;
>
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s-%s-%d", drv_name, if_name,
> - vec_name, vidx);
> + vec_name, vector);
I can see how this was confused by reading the surrounding code. The
vidx variable name is quite confusing, but that already exists.
Other than the above comment, the change LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>
>
> err = request_irq(irq_num, idpf_vport_intr_clean_queues, 0,
> name, q_vector);
> --
> 2.52.0.457.g6b5491de43-goog
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists