[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9743e516-20d1-4f73-a566-1fdd415d60a9@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:50:00 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Lucien.Jheng" <lucienzx159@...il.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: phy: air_en8811h: factor out
shareable code
> -static int en8811h_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +static int en8811h_get_lpa(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> - struct en8811h_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> - u32 pbus_value;
> - int ret, val;
> + int ret;
>
> ret = genphy_update_link(phydev);
> if (ret)
This call to genphy_update_link() means this function is doing more
than en8811h_get_lpa() would imply.
It is hard to see from just the patch, but it also seems to set the
state in phydev back to unknown defaults, and read the master/slave
status?
So i think it needs a better name.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists