netdev - Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock sampling control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5c0bfdb-316d-4796-afa0-f6f018ceb414@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 04:19:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: 李志 <lizhi2@...incomputing.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
	alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ningyu@...incomputing.com, linmin@...incomputing.com,
	pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com, weishangjuan@...incomputing.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock
 sampling control

> > You say internal. So the skew is fixed, it is a property of the
> > silicon? If so, why a DT property? Why not just hard code it in the
> > driver? Since it is internal, different boards should not need it set
> > differently?
> > 
> Thanks for the question.
> 
> EIC7700 has two Ethernet MACs. Only eth1 has this internal RXC/RXD skew,
> eth0 does not.
> 
> So this is not a chip-wide constant that can be hardcoded in the driver.
> We need a way to distinguish the two MAC instances, which is why this is
> described per-port in DTS.

I assume the address of the interface is fixed. So you can just key
off that to distinguish the two instances.

Since this is an internal property, not a board property, it is not
clear it actually belongs on DT.

    Andrew