netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] net: stmmac: SerDes, PCS, BASE-X, and inband goodies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260124000409.36nsxlvkde4zpddk@skbuf>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 02:04:09 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Mohd Ayaan Anwar <mohd.anwar@....qualcomm.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] net: stmmac: SerDes, PCS, BASE-X, and
 inband goodies

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:13:26AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> According to patchwork, this doesn't apply to net-next. That's odd,
> it was generated on last night's net next, and although there has been
> further work, it rebases cleanly on top of this morning's. How can
> these changes:
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c   |  6 +++++-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> which happened in net-next overnight result in this change in patch 1:
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> failing to apply?
> 
> No, patchwork is clearly wrong.

Conflicts with commit dc6597fab3e3 ("net: stmmac: dwmac-imx: keep
preamble before sfd on i.MX8MP"), merged in the meantime.

In include/linux/stmmac.h (your commit "net: stmmac: add stmmac core
serdes support" adds a "struct phy;" line, but that other commit
modifies the context by inserting:

#define STMMAC_FLAG_KEEP_PREAMBLE_BEFORE_SFD	BIT(14)

(the last stmmac flag in your context, at patch generation time, was:
#define STMMAC_FLAG_HWTSTAMP_CORRECT_LATENCY	BIT(13)
)