netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring/zcrx: implement large rx buffer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8ce09f91-0706-4883-9b7e-1855c8dd5c2a@kernel.dk>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:32:47 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring/zcrx: implement large rx buffer support

On 1/24/26 3:36 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c
> index b99cf2c6670a..b5166c9118e5 100644
> --- a/io_uring/zcrx.c
> +++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>  #include <net/netdev_queues.h>
>  #include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
> +#include <net/netdev_queues.h>
>  #include <net/tcp.h>
>  #include <net/rps.h>

Duplicate header? Rest of the patch looks fine to me, I'll just kill it
while applying.

-- 
Jens Axboe