netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring/zcrx: implement large rx buffer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <edc2351c-f8cc-4bfe-8cf0-691f13619c1d@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 16:31:32 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring/zcrx: implement large rx buffer support

On 1/24/26 15:32, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/24/26 3:36 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c
>> index b99cf2c6670a..b5166c9118e5 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/zcrx.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>   #include <net/netlink.h>
>>   #include <net/netdev_queues.h>
>>   #include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
>> +#include <net/netdev_queues.h>
>>   #include <net/tcp.h>
>>   #include <net/rps.h>
> 
> Duplicate header? Rest of the patch looks fine to me, I'll just kill it
> while applying.

Looks like it, probably slipped through during rebases

-- 
Pavel Begunkov