[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260125223812.3a2ae148@pumpkin>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 22:38:12 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Andrew
Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] u64_stats: Allow u64_stats_add() to
accept s64
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 06:07:49 +0800
David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com> wrote:
> The current u64_stats_add() accepts only unsigned long, which makes no
> sense as u64_stats_set() accepts u64 already, and causes unnecessary
> narrowing on 32-bit architectures.
Isn't is a chicken/egg?
A value over 2^31 could just be a very large value that needs to be added.
Where the add is being done 'just in time' so avoid overflow.
David
>
> Moreover, since there's no u64_stats_sub(), users may be tempted to
> reuse it for decrements, which already happened on nft_counter_reset()
> in net/netfilter/nft_counter.c .
>
> Change to s64 to allow both positive and negative values.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
> index 457879938fc1..e77f2b30bac7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
> +++ b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline void u64_stats_set(u64_stats_t *p, u64 val)
> local64_set(&p->v, val);
> }
>
> -static inline void u64_stats_add(u64_stats_t *p, unsigned long val)
> +static inline void u64_stats_add(u64_stats_t *p, s64 val)
> {
> local64_add(val, &p->v);
> }
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void u64_stats_set(u64_stats_t *p, u64 val)
> p->v = val;
> }
>
> -static inline void u64_stats_add(u64_stats_t *p, unsigned long val)
> +static inline void u64_stats_add(u64_stats_t *p, s64 val)
> {
> p->v += val;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists