netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: usb: remove unnecessary get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXc3PUbofartuTS-@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:43:25 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
	Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>,
	Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
	Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
	Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
	Max Schulze <max.schulze@...ine.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: usb: remove unnecessary get_drvinfo
 code and driver versions

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 5:22 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > There are three problems with this version:
> > 1) you haven't taken my tag, why?
> > 2) there is no changelog to understand what's going on;
> > 3) the v2 was sent too quickly (usually should be 24h+ between the versions).
> 
> Sorry about that. The only change is that I had overlooked smsc[79]5xx
> in the original patch because they had a version definition but didn't
> use it in get_drvinfo. I will follow these procedures even for trivial
> changes in the future.

So, it sounds like v3 will be seen soon?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko