netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3 6/7] net/sched: act_gate: reject empty schedule list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+NMeC-65UfJyq=34_K9tzf9J=-XFPJqDe1BxLNZv0mnjkxZEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 09:05:49 -0300
From: Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>
To: Paul Moses <p@....org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, 
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 6/7] net/sched: act_gate: reject empty schedule list

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 5:53 AM Paul Moses <p@....org> wrote:
>
> Should REPLACE with an explicit entry list that yields 0 entries return -EINVAL or should it be treated the same as omitting TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST and keeping the old schedule?

It should be treated the same as omitting TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST and keeping
the old schedule.

cheers,
Victor