[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18ed7727-b68e-4611-b9cb-6884408835ef@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:15:31 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, sdf@...ichev.me,
petrm@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/10] geneve: introduce double tunnel GSO/GRO
support
On 1/23/26 8:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:11:26 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> This is the [belated] incarnation of topic discussed in the last Neconf
>> [1].
>
> In case you find yourself with spare cycles or an intern -- adding a
> test case to tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/tso.py could save
> us some driver surprises?
I'll try to have a look and/or offload it so someone else. I have a
vague suspect that the additional setup will require some rework - hence
the offload one would be the preferred option.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists