[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXd7aSk7KIxlQd5z@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:34:17 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/22] net: stmmac: rk: add SoC specific
->init() method
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:45:28AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Add a SoC specific init method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
I see the AI review has identified that this patch has an issue, whereas
in the previous review, it was fine with this patch. I can't imagine what
it's problem with this patch is, and there's no way to find out for
about 9 hours (more like 19 hours for me because of the timezone) as the
AI reviews are not accessible until then. Makes me wonder whether it's
worth continuing to submit patches to netdev anymore.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists