netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] devlink: Implement devlink param multi attribute nested data values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260126171859.5097dfb5@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 17:18:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed
 <saeedm@...dia.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
 <horms@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko
 <jiri@...nulli.us>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, "Matthieu Baerts
 (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>, Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] devlink: Implement devlink param multi
 attribute nested data values

On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 08:09:44 +0530 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> Devlink param value attribute is not defined since devlink is handling
> the value validating and parsing internally, this allows us to implement
> multi attribute values without breaking any policies.
> 
> Devlink param multi-attribute values are considered to be dynamically
> sized arrays of u32 values, by introducing a new devlink param type
> DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_U32_ARRAY, driver and user space can set a variable
> count of u32 values into the DEVLINK_ATTR_PARAM_VALUE_DATA attribute.
> 
> Implement get/set parsing and add to the internal value structure passed
> to drivers.
> 
> This is useful for devices that need to configure a list of values for
> a specific configuration.

Could you respin this as a series with the first driver implementing
a param of this type?  We can't merge an API without a user.
-- 
pw-bot: cr