[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXiwkXKg7uvIon4p@strlen.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:33:21 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: "Remy D. Farley" <one-d-wide@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] doc/netlink: nftables: Add getcompat operation
Remy D. Farley <one-d-wide@...tonmail.com> wrote:
> > Whats the intent here? nft_compat isn't used by nftables, this
> > is iptables-nft compatibility glue.
>
> I noticed getcompat operation used by `nft list ruleset` command, and it
> doesn't seem to be defined anywhere else. Should I re/move it?
Its used by compatibility mode, it requires an nft binary linked
to libxtables, native nftables doesn't need it.
I would prefer not to mention its existence.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists