lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127132919.xsvapgqc65f44iah@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 15:29:19 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: dsa: lantiq,gswip:
 reference common PHY properties

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 01:18:37PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Reference the common PHY properties so RX and TX SerDes lane polarity
> of the SGMII/1000Base-X/2500Base-X PCS can be configured.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml
> index f601e5f9fa6a..bf199b096dc5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ patternProperties:
>      patternProperties:
>        "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-6]$":
>          $ref: dsa-port.yaml#
> +        $ref: /schemas/phy/phy-common-props.yaml#

Is the PCS integrated into the port? have you considered whether it will
ever need to have its own OF node representation?

>          unevaluatedProperties: false
>  
>          properties:
> -- 
> 2.52.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ