[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXjHYyB1jYNxaFm7@strlen.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 15:10:43 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: "Remy D. Farley" <one-d-wide@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] doc/netlink: nftables: Add getcompat operation
Remy D. Farley <one-d-wide@...tonmail.com> wrote:
> > And perhaps mention that this is only for iptables-nft in the yaml file too.
> > (nft uses it on 'nft list' only if it encounters a rule added by iptables-nft).
>
> Do you mean to still add getcompat operation to spec in the kernel tree?
> In case I misrepresented it, netlink-bindings is not a kernel project. And
> AFACT, this issue isn't relevant for ynl C library, as it would only try to
> decodes messages from operations you sent.
Oh, indeed, I misunderstood. In that case I think its better to not add
it to the yaml spec.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists