[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127103825.7fcc86e3@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:38:25 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, heiko@...ech.de,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,06/22] net: stmmac: rk: add SoC specific ->init()
method
On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:42:05 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> If I'm going to have to split it up just for the sake of reducing the
> cost of AI review,
Incorrect, as previously stated do not worry about the cost.
I was citing the cost as the reason we can't give people open
access to the AI bot.
> can I ask for a moritorium on other development changes to dwmac-rk
> until this is merged?
Seems reasonable, as long as you're posting and making active progress
we can prioritize merging this work.
> As I see it, this is required _because_ of the introduction of AI
> review, not because something has actually changed.
Can't argue with how you feel.
> You have said in the past to me that the 15 patch limit is only
> advisory and can be exceeded where it makes sense to, and for this
> series, it does make sense.
Advisory is too weak. Unless there's a strong reason not to break up
the series it should be under 15 patches.
This conversation doesn't feel very productive. Let me just apply
patches 1-4 and move on :|
Powered by blists - more mailing lists