[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127004103.3785897-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:41:03 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
heiko@...ech.de,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
andrew@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,22/22] net: stmmac: rk: rk3506, rk3528 and kk3588 have rmii_mode in clock register
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: stmmac: rk: rk3506, rk3528 and kk3588 have rmii_mode in clock register
This patch moves the rmii_mode bit configuration for rk3506, rk3528 and
rk3588 from the SoC-specific set_to_rmii() functions to the common
rk_gmac_powerup() path, using the new rmii_mode_mask field in the clock
register configuration.
> net: stmmac: rk: rk3506, rk3528 and kk3588 have rmii_mode in clock register
^^^^^^
This isn't a bug, but the subject line has a typo: "kk3588" should be
"rk3588". The commit body correctly refers to "rk3588" and the code
changes reference rk3588_ops, rk3588_init, and RK3588_* macros.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists