[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8a10b5355b750cfc83a7f746347175ab40b64d7.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 13:04:21 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: stmmac: rk: fix missing
reset_control_put()
On Mi, 2026-01-28 at 10:58 +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> rk_gmac_setup() delves into the PHY's DT node to retrieve its reset
> control using of_reset_control_get(). However, it never releases it
> when the driver is removed. Add reset_control_put() to rk_gmac_exit()
> to clean this up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> index 5f8d2031b97c..bc69cbb5a7d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -1784,6 +1784,8 @@ static void rk_gmac_exit(struct device *dev, void *bsp_priv_)
>
> if (priv->plat->phy_node && bsp_priv->integrated_phy)
> clk_put(bsp_priv->clk_phy);
> +
> + reset_control_put(bsp_priv->phy_reset);
> }
>
> static int rk_gmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
This is fine because the driver sets plat_dat->suspend, and so
rk_gmac_exit() is never called via stmmac_pltfr_exit() during suspend.
It does look a bit sketchy to release resources in the rk_gmac_exit()
counterpart to rk_gmac_init(), which never requested the resources,
though. Maybe use devm_add_action_or_reset() to register the release of
the reset during remove?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists