netdev - Re: [net-next,v5,05/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate default MCAM indexes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXmCpZWl9JHk2bpC@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 08:59:41 +0530
From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <sumang@...vell.com>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next,v5,05/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate default
 MCAM indexes

On 2026-01-28 at 07:59:21, Jakub Kicinski (kuba@...nel.org) wrote:
> > +chk_sanity:
> > +	dev_dbg(rvu->dev,
> > +		"%s: Default index for pcifunc=%#x, bcast=%u mcast=%u promise=%u ucast=%u cnt=%u\n",
>                                                                        ^^^^^^^
>
> Should "promise" be "promisc" here? This appears to be a typo in the debug
> message.
ACK.

>
>
> > +/**
> > + * enum npc_dft_rule_id - Default rule type
> > + *
> > + * Mcam default rule type.
> > + *
> > + * @NPC_DFT_RULE_START_ID:	Not used
> > + * @NPC_DFT_RULE_PROMISC_ID:	promiscuous rule
> > + * @NPC_DFT_RULE_MCAST_ID:	promiscuous rule
>                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>
> Should this say "multicast rule" instead of "promiscuous rule"? It appears
>
ACK.

>
> > + * @NPC_DFT_RULE_BCAST_ID:	broadcast rule
> > + * @NPC_DFT_RULE_UCAST_ID:	unicast rule
> > + * @NPC_DFT_RULE_MAX_ID:	Maximum index.
> > + */
> --
> pw-bot: cr