[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7df10272-a06b-4509-ab8a-519d43944424@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:10:12 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
xiaolei.wang@...driver.com, quic_abchauha@...cinc.com,
quic_sarohasa@...cinc.com
Cc: imx@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: add device link between MAC device and MDIO
device
Hi
[...]
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 81984d4ebb7c..d5ac7506fe39 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1768,12 +1768,21 @@ int phy_attach_direct(struct net_device *dev, struct phy_device *phydev,
>
> /**
> * If the external phy used by current mac interface is managed by
> - * another mac interface, so we should create a device link between
> - * phy dev and mac dev.
> + * another MDIO controller, which means that the MAC and MDIO are
> + * separated devices, then we should create a device link between
> + * the MAC device and the MDIO device.
> */
I was confused by the use of the "MDIO device" terminology here, which
refers to a device sitting on an mdio bus, such as a PHY. I think though
that what you actually refer to is the MDIO controller itself, right ?
> - if (dev && phydev->mdio.bus->parent && dev->dev.parent != phydev->mdio.bus->parent)
> - phydev->devlink = device_link_add(dev->dev.parent, &phydev->mdio.dev,
> - DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> + if (dev && phydev->mdio.bus->parent &&
> + dev->dev.parent != phydev->mdio.bus->parent) {
> + if (!device_link_add(dev->dev.parent, phydev->mdio.bus->parent,
> + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |
> + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER)) {
Don't we have the same problem with SFP ? The struct mii_bus for SFP
PHYs also completely disappears when you remove the module.
That being said, I ran some tests with SFP and this patch, and the
netdev actually didn't dissapear under my feet.
I'm a total noob with fw_devlink, but I can see there seems to already
be a link between MAC devices and the associated SFP bus :
on cyclone V :
# ls /sys/class/devlink
[...]
platform:sfp--platform:ff702000.ethernet
on macchiatobin :
# ls /sys/class/devlink
[...]
platform:sfp-eth3--platform:f4000000.ethernet
So I guess this is what's preventing the netdev from going away.
Now, these seems to be automagically populated based on DT, but I don't
know if it also works with non-DT platforms. If this is DT-specific,
then I guess we still can't use DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER.
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists