[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_eHu0=8G7--neMHz5CDT4_MV-MONRu8obOsYbUhCc1ocg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:37:51 -0500
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, quic@...ts.linux.dev, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>, Moritz Buhl <mbuhl@...nbsd.org>, Tyler Fanelli <tfanelli@...hat.com>,
Pengtao He <hepengtao@...omi.com>, Thomas Dreibholz <dreibh@...ula.no>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Steve Dickson <steved@...hat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>,
John Ericson <mail@...nericson.me>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"D . Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
illiliti <illiliti@...tonmail.com>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@...x.se>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 15/15] quic: add packet parser base
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:53 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/26 3:51 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> > +/* Lookup listening socket for Client Initial packet (in process context). */
> > +static struct sock *quic_packet_get_listen_sock(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + union quic_addr daddr, saddr;
> > + struct quic_data alpns = {};
> > + struct sock *sk;
> > +
> > + quic_get_msg_addrs(skb, &daddr, &saddr);
> > +
> > + if (quic_packet_parse_alpn(skb, &alpns))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + local_bh_disable();
>
> Is this really needed? If so, it needs some comment explaining the
> rationale, otherwise please drop it.
>
It was needed, as a spin_lock use in quic_listen_sock_lookup(), now
it's changed to rcu_read_lock(), maybe I should drop it. will double check.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists