[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aX0B1xaFGL43xxUn@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 20:09:11 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] netfilter: updates for net-next
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:54:20 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > v2: discard buggy nfqueue patch, no other changes.
> >
> > The following patchset contains Netfilter updates for *net-next*:
> >
> > Patches 1 to 4 add IP6IP6 tunneling acceleration to the flowtable
> > infrastructure. Patch 5 extends test coverage for this.
> > From Lorenzo Bianconi.
> >
> > Patch 6 removes a duplicated helper from xt_time extension, we can
> > use an existing helper for this, from Jinjie Ruan.
> >
> > Patch 7 adds an rhashtable to nfnetink_queue to speed up out-of-order
> > verdict processing. Before this list walk was required due to in-order
> > design assumption.
>
> Hi Florian, some more KASAN today:
>
> https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/nf-dbg/results/496421/vm-crash-thr0-0
> [ 1144.170509][ T12] ==================================================================
> [ 1144.170759][ T12] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in idr_for_each+0x1c1/0x1f0
> [ 1144.170922][ T12] Read of size 8 at addr ff11000012a16a70 by task kworker/u16:0/12
> [ 1144.171079][ T12]
> [ 1144.171133][ T12] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full)
> [ 1144.171137][ T12] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [ 1144.171139][ T12] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
> [ 1144.171145][ T12] Call Trace:
> [ 1144.171147][ T12] <TASK>
> [ 1144.171149][ T12] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0
> [ 1144.171154][ T12] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x6e/0x300
> [ 1144.171159][ T12] print_report+0xfc/0x1fb
> [ 1144.171161][ T12] ? idr_for_each+0x1c1/0x1f0
> [ 1144.171163][ T12] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x1da/0x430
> [ 1144.171167][ T12] ? idr_for_each+0x1c1/0x1f0
> [ 1144.171168][ T12] kasan_report+0xe8/0x120
Sigh. Doesn't ring a bell, I will have a look.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists