[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260131154338.4d6b36a2@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:43:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
razor@...ckwall.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com,
sdf@...ichev.me, john.fastabend@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
jordan@...fe.io, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
dw@...idwei.uk, toke@...hat.com, yangzhenze@...edance.com,
wangdongdong.6@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 03/16] net: Add lease info to queue-get
response
On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 23:28:17 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Populate nested lease info to the queue-get response that returns the
> ifindex, queue id with type and optionally netns id if the device
> resides in a different netns.
> +enum netif_lease_dir {
> + NETIF_VIRT_TO_PHYS,
> + NETIF_PHYS_TO_VIRT,
> +};
> +
> +struct netdev_rx_queue *
> +__netif_get_rx_queue_lease(struct net_device **dev, unsigned int *rxq,
> + enum netif_lease_dir dir);
dev.h
> #endif /* _LINUX_NETDEV_RX_QUEUE_H */
> diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> index a0b4a9197b91..7d073894ca74 100644
> --- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> +++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> @@ -391,8 +391,11 @@ netdev_nl_queue_fill_one(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct net_device *netdev,
> u32 q_idx, u32 q_type, const struct genl_info *info)
> {
> struct pp_memory_provider_params *params;
> + struct net_device *orig_netdev = netdev;
> + struct nlattr *nest_lease, *nest_queue;
> struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
> struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + u32 lease_q_idx = q_idx;
No need to init this, no?
> void *hdr;
>
> hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
> @@ -410,6 +413,37 @@ netdev_nl_queue_fill_one(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct net_device *netdev,
> if (nla_put_napi_id(rsp, rxq->napi))
> goto nla_put_failure;
>
> + if (netif_rx_queue_lease_get_owner(&netdev, &lease_q_idx)) {
Does it work if we factored this out to a helper?
Also apparently the words lessee and lessor are legit English words.
I wonder if using those would make the code quite a bit easier to
follow when we have to refer to the lease in a specific direction.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists