[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e19f42-05f9-4857-9b18-29192b0a1926@maowtm.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 16:19:51 +0000
From: Tingmao Wang <m@...wtm.org>
To: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@...fet.re>
Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Günther Noack <gnoack@...gle.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@...wei-partners.com>,
konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 6/8] selftests/landlock: Add tests for UDP sendmsg
Hi Matthieu,
I noticed in passing that
On 12/12/25 16:37, Matthieu Buffet wrote:
> [...]
> + EXPECT_EQ(-EACCES, sendto_variant(sock_fd, &self->srv0, "A", 1, 0));
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_prot(self->audit_fd, "net.sendto_udp", "daddr",
> + variant->addr, "dest"));
net.sendto_udp should probably be net\.sendto_udp
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records));
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access);
> + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain);
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(-EACCES, sendto_variant(sock_fd, &self->unspec_srv0, "B", 1, 0));
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_prot(self->audit_fd, "net.sendto_udp", "daddr",
> + NULL, "dest"));
and same here
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records));
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access);
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain);
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(sock_fd));
> +}
> +
> TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
Powered by blists - more mailing lists