[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f57fb3f-3d33-41d7-99e0-7867395ce792@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 09:27:41 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Marek Mietus <mmietus97@...oo.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sd@...asysnail.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: Jason@...c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 07/11] net: tunnel: convert ip_md_tunnel_xmit
to use a noref dst when possible
On 1/27/26 8:04 AM, Marek Mietus wrote:
> ip_md_tunnel_xmit unnecessarily references the dst_entry from the
> dst_cache when interacting with the cache.
>
> Reduce this overhead by avoiding the redundant refcount increments.
>
> This is only possible in flows where the cache is used. Otherwise, we
> fall-back to a referenced dst.
>
> This change is safe since ipv4 supports noref xmit under RCU which is
> already the case for ip_md_tunnel_xmit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Mietus <mmietus97@...oo.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> index 2136a46bcdc5..40ff6ad9b9b9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ void ip_md_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>
> use_cache = ip_tunnel_dst_cache_usable(skb, tun_info);
> if (use_cache)
> - rt = dst_cache_get_ip4(&tun_info->dst_cache, &fl4.saddr);
> + rt = dst_cache_get_ip4_rcu(&tun_info->dst_cache, &fl4.saddr);
> if (!rt) {
> rt = ip_route_output_key(tunnel->net, &fl4);
> if (IS_ERR(rt)) {
> @@ -617,11 +617,12 @@ void ip_md_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> goto tx_error;
> }
> if (use_cache)
> - dst_cache_set_ip4(&tun_info->dst_cache, &rt->dst,
> - fl4.saddr);
> + dst_cache_steal_ip4(&tun_info->dst_cache, &rt->dst,
> + fl4.saddr);
Similarly to what Sabrina noted on patch 4/11 it looks like that:
else
ip_rt_put(rt);
here will avoid a bit of later conditionals. Similar note for patch 8/11.
I must add that the amount of code churn and possible regressions looks
IMHO excessive for the reported performance delta.
/P
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists