[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfwuhrUZiFp5v0EjbMJw0fYZTfznqPN_6yuMWxnD4ircQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:28:59 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] Revert "net: ag71xx: use devm for register_netdev"
On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 10:48 PM Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit cc20a4791641a1cbd1525695fac0d4725dd72509.
>
> register_netdev gets called after phylink_create which has no devm
> equivalent. phylink_destroy must be called after unregister_netdev and
> not before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
> ---
Can we just use devm_add_action_or_reset() with a callback calling
phylink_destroy()? It will surely make error handling in probe easier
and avoid mixing devm and non-managed APIs.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists