lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd8e35c7-d7a9-44d1-9929-5a6a1cfb4f05@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 14:16:03 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Min Lin <linmin@...incomputing.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Bo Gan <ganboing@...il.com>,
	李志 <lizhi2@...incomputing.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ningyu@...incomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com,
	weishangjuan@...incomputing.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock
 sampling control

> Do you think it would be reasonable for eth1 to have another different compatible
> string, such as "eswin,eic7700-qos-eth-quirk"?

I think you can argue the two Ethernets are not compatible with each
other. But i personally would not use 'quirk'. Maybe something which
says how they differ?

     Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ