[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd8e35c7-d7a9-44d1-9929-5a6a1cfb4f05@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 14:16:03 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Min Lin <linmin@...incomputing.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Bo Gan <ganboing@...il.com>,
李志 <lizhi2@...incomputing.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ningyu@...incomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com,
weishangjuan@...incomputing.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock
sampling control
> Do you think it would be reasonable for eth1 to have another different compatible
> string, such as "eswin,eic7700-qos-eth-quirk"?
I think you can argue the two Ethernets are not compatible with each
other. But i personally would not use 'quirk'. Maybe something which
says how they differ?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists