[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260203031902.934664-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 19:19:02 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: one-d-wide@...tonmail.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
phil@....cc,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pablo@...filter.org,
coreteam@...filter.org,
fw@...len.de,
donald.hunter@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v7,3/5] doc/netlink: nftables: Update attribute sets
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
doc/netlink: nftables: Update attribute sets
This commit adds new attribute sets (log-attrs, numgen-attrs, range-attrs,
compat-target-attrs, compat-match-attrs, compat-attrs), adds missing
attributes and checks, and fixes byte-order annotations for the nftables
netlink specification.
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/nftables.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/nftables.yaml
> index f15f825cb3a1..2ddf89c70124 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/nftables.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/nftables.yaml
[ ... ]
> + -
> + name: range-attrs
> + attributes:
> + # Mentioned in net/netfilter/nft_range.c
> + -
> + name: sreg
> + doc: source register of data to compare
> + type: u32
> + byte-order: big-endian
> + enum: registers
> + -
> + name: op
> + doc: cmp operation
> + type: u32
> + byte-order: big-endian
> + enum: range-ops
> + checks:
> + max: 256
Should this be max: 255? Looking at nft_range_init() in net/netfilter/nft_range.c,
the kernel uses nft_parse_u32_check(tb[NFTA_RANGE_OP], U8_MAX, &op), where U8_MAX
is 255. This spec would allow 256 which the kernel rejects with -ERANGE.
[ ... ]
> + -
> + name: compat-target-attrs
> + header: linux/netfilter/nf_tables_compat.h
> + attributes:
> + -
> + name: name
> + type: string
> + checks:
> + max-len: 32
> + -
> + name: rev
> + type: u32
> + byte-order: big-endian
> + -
> + name: info
> + type: binary
> + -
> + name: compat-match-attrs
> + header: linux/netfilter/nf_tables_compat.h
> + attributes:
> + -
> + name: name
> + type: string
> + checks:
> + max-len: 32
> + -
> + name: rev
> + type: u32
> + byte-order: big-endian
> + checks:
> + max: 255
Should compat-target-attrs also have checks: max: 255 for its rev field? The
kernel's nft_target_policy uses NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_BE32, 255) for NFTA_TARGET_REV,
same as compat-match-attrs, but compat-target-attrs rev field above is missing
this check.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists