lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADkSEUhXO-01yaNUawo58MQ=xOC5bCDHWCFrCwe6TX2D+WVR=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 02:15:44 -0800
From: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@...il.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, 
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>
Subject: PCI ID conflict between ipw2x00 and i40e

I have written a script to find device IDs that are claimed by
multiple drivers in the kernel. It has found that the PCI ID 8086:104f
is supported by both drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00 and
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e. I assume the i40e one is correct,
since that's what the ID is assigned to in the pci.ids database. Can
anyone at Intel confirm this?

Ethan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ