[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20297648.sWSEgdgrri@diego>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 23:03:51 +0100
From: Heiko StĂĽbner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: stmmac: rk: use rk_encode_wm16() for clock
selection
Am Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2026, 10:14:38 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Russell King (Oracle):
> Use rk_encode_wm16() for RMII clock gating control, and also for the
> io_clksel bit used to select the transmit clock between CRU-derived
> and IO-derived clock sources.
>
> Both of these were configured via the "set_clock_selection" method in
> the SoC specific operations, but there is no requirement to change the
> io_clksel except when enabling clocks.
>
> It is also possible that we don't need to ungate the RMII clock if we
> are operating in RGMII mode, but this commit makes no change there.
>
> Split up the configuration of these as separate functions, and remove
> the set_clock_selection() method. Since these clocking bits are in the
> same register that we call the "speed" register, move the logic for
> writing that register into rk_write_speed_grf_reg().
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 174 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> index 4099cbc5d0de..ed9adac70f0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -27,8 +27,17 @@
> struct rk_priv_data;
>
> struct rk_clock_fields {
> + /* io_clksel_cru_mask - io_clksel bit in clock GRF register which,
> + * when set, selects the tx clock from CRU.
> + */
> + u16 io_clksel_cru_mask;
> + /* io_clksel_io_mask - io_clksel bit in clock GRF register which,
> + * when set, selects the tx clock from IO.
> + */
nit: comment stile does not seem to follow the kernel coding style
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst#n622
> + u16 io_clksel_io_mask;
> u16 gmii_clk_sel_mask;
> u16 rmii_clk_sel_mask;
> + u16 rmii_gate_en_mask;
> u16 mac_speed_mask;
> };
[...]
> + /* The io_clksel configuration can be either:
> + * 0=CRU, 1=IO (rk3506, rk3520, rk3576) or
> + * 0=IO, 1=CRU (rk3588)
> + * where CRU means the transmit clock comes from the CRU and IO
> + * means the transmit clock comes from IO.
> + *
> + * Handle this by having two masks.
> + */
nit: same as above
Other than these 2 nits, this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> #px30,rk3328,rk3568,rk3588
Powered by blists - more mailing lists