[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260205070208.186382-11-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 23:01:59 -0800
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
memxor@...il.com,
martin.lau@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org,
haoluo@...gle.com,
ameryhung@...il.com,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/17] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage
Introduce bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() to properly handle errors returned
from rqspinlock in bpf_local_storage_map_free() and
bpf_local_storage_destroy() where the operation must succeeds.
The idea of bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() is to allow an selem to be
partially linked and use atomic operation on a bit field, selem->state,
to determine when and who can free the selem if any unlink under lock
fails. An selem initially is fully linked to a map and a local storage.
Under normal circumstances, bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() will be able to
grab locks and unlink a selem from map and local storage in sequeunce,
just like bpf_selem_unlink(), and then free it after an RCU grace period.
However, if any of the lock attempts fails, it will only clear
SDATA(selem)->smap or selem->local_storage depending on the caller and
set SELEM_MAP_UNLINKED or SELEM_STORAGE_UNLINKED according to the
caller. Then, after both map_free() and destroy() see the selem and the
state becomes SELEM_UNLINKED, one of two racing caller can succeed in
cmpxchg the state from SELEM_UNLINKED to SELEM_TOFREE, ensuring no
double free or memory leak.
To make sure bpf_obj_free_fields() is done only once and when map is
still present, it is called when unlinking an selem from b->list under
b->lock.
To make sure uncharging memory is done only when the owner is still
present in map_free(), block destroy() from returning until there is no
pending map_free().
Since smap may not be valid in destroy(), bpf_selem_unlink_nofail()
skips bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock_misc() when called from destroy().
This is okay as bpf_local_storage_destroy() will return the remaining
amount of memory charge tracked by mem_charge to the owner to uncharge.
It is also safe to skip clearing local_storage->owner and owner_storage
as the owner is being freed and no users or bpf programs should be able
to reference the owner and using local_storage.
Finally, access of selem, SDATA(selem)->smap and selem->local_storage
are racy. Callers will protect these fields with RCU.
Co-developed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 9 ++-
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index a34ed7fa81d8..69a5d8aa765d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_data {
u8 data[] __aligned(8);
};
+#define SELEM_MAP_UNLINKED (1 << 0)
+#define SELEM_STORAGE_UNLINKED (1 << 1)
+#define SELEM_UNLINKED (SELEM_MAP_UNLINKED | SELEM_STORAGE_UNLINKED)
+#define SELEM_TOFREE (1 << 2)
+
/* Linked to bpf_local_storage and bpf_local_storage_map */
struct bpf_local_storage_elem {
struct hlist_node map_node; /* Linked to bpf_local_storage_map */
@@ -80,8 +85,9 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_elem {
* after raw_spin_unlock
*/
};
+ atomic_t state;
bool use_kmalloc_nolock;
- /* 7 bytes hole */
+ /* 3 bytes hole */
/* The data is stored in another cacheline to minimize
* the number of cachelines access during a cache hit.
*/
@@ -97,6 +103,7 @@ struct bpf_local_storage {
struct rcu_head rcu;
rqspinlock_t lock; /* Protect adding/removing from the "list" */
u64 mem_charge; /* Copy of mem charged to owner. Protected by "lock" */
+ refcount_t owner_refcnt;/* Used to pin owner when map_free is uncharging */
bool use_kmalloc_nolock;
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index f8cfef31e3b8..4bd0b5552c33 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ bpf_selem_alloc(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner,
if (selem) {
RCU_INIT_POINTER(SDATA(selem)->smap, smap);
+ atomic_set(&selem->state, 0);
selem->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock;
if (value) {
@@ -194,9 +195,11 @@ static void bpf_selem_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
/* The bpf_local_storage_map_free will wait for rcu_barrier */
smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, 1);
- migrate_disable();
- bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
- migrate_enable();
+ if (smap) {
+ migrate_disable();
+ bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
+ migrate_enable();
+ }
kfree_nolock(selem);
}
@@ -221,7 +224,8 @@ void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
* is only supported in task local storage, where
* smap->use_kmalloc_nolock == true.
*/
- bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
+ if (smap)
+ bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
__bpf_selem_free(selem, reuse_now);
return;
}
@@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ static void bpf_selem_free_list(struct hlist_head *list, bool reuse_now)
static void bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock_misc(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
- bool free_local_storage)
+ bool free_local_storage, bool pin_owner)
{
void *owner = local_storage->owner;
u32 uncharge = smap->elem_size;
@@ -264,6 +268,9 @@ static void bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock_misc(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *
SDATA(selem))
RCU_INIT_POINTER(local_storage->cache[smap->cache_idx], NULL);
+ if (pin_owner && !refcount_inc_not_zero(&local_storage->owner_refcnt))
+ return;
+
uncharge += free_local_storage ? sizeof(*local_storage) : 0;
mem_uncharge(smap, local_storage->owner, uncharge);
local_storage->mem_charge -= uncharge;
@@ -274,6 +281,9 @@ static void bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock_misc(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *
/* After this RCU_INIT, owner may be freed and cannot be used */
RCU_INIT_POINTER(*owner_storage(smap, owner), NULL);
}
+
+ if (pin_owner)
+ refcount_dec(&local_storage->owner_refcnt);
}
/* local_storage->lock must be held and selem->local_storage == local_storage.
@@ -295,7 +305,7 @@ static bool bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_stor
&local_storage->list);
bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock_misc(selem, smap, local_storage,
- free_local_storage);
+ free_local_storage, false);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->snode);
@@ -412,6 +422,94 @@ int bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
return err;
}
+/*
+ * Unlink an selem from map and local storage with lockless fallback if callers
+ * are racing or rqspinlock returns error. It should only be called by
+ * bpf_local_storage_destroy() or bpf_local_storage_map_free().
+ */
+static void bpf_selem_unlink_nofail(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b)
+{
+ bool in_map_free = !!b, free_storage = false;
+ struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int err, unlink = 0;
+
+ local_storage = rcu_dereference_check(selem->local_storage, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
+ smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
+
+ if (smap) {
+ b = b ? : select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
+ err = raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
+ if (!err) {
+ /*
+ * Call bpf_obj_free_fields() under b->lock to make sure it is done
+ * exactly once for an selem. Safe to free special fields immediately
+ * as no BPF program should be referencing the selem.
+ */
+ if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem))) {
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
+ bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
+ unlink++;
+ }
+ raw_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+ }
+ /*
+ * Highly unlikely scenario: resource leak
+ *
+ * When map_free(selem1), destroy(selem1) and destroy(selem2) are racing
+ * and both selem belong to the same bucket, if destroy(selem2) acquired
+ * b->lock and block for too long, neither map_free(selem1) and
+ * destroy(selem1) will be able to free the special field associated
+ * with selem1 as raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave() returns -ETIMEDOUT.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(err && in_map_free);
+ if (!err || in_map_free)
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(SDATA(selem)->smap, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (local_storage) {
+ err = raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&local_storage->lock, flags);
+ if (!err) {
+ if (likely(selem_linked_to_storage(selem))) {
+ free_storage = hlist_is_singular_node(&selem->snode,
+ &local_storage->list);
+ /*
+ * Okay to skip clearing owner_storage and storage->owner in
+ * destroy() since the owner is going away. No user or bpf
+ * programs should be able to reference it.
+ */
+ if (smap && in_map_free)
+ bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock_misc(
+ selem, smap, local_storage,
+ free_storage, true);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->snode);
+ unlink++;
+ }
+ raw_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags);
+ }
+ if (!err || !in_map_free)
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(selem->local_storage, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (unlink != 2)
+ atomic_or(in_map_free ? SELEM_MAP_UNLINKED : SELEM_STORAGE_UNLINKED, &selem->state);
+
+ /*
+ * Normally, an selem can be unlinked under local_storage->lock and b->lock, and
+ * then freed after an RCU grace period. However, if destroy() and map_free() are
+ * racing or rqspinlock returns errors in unlikely situations (unlink != 2), free
+ * the selem only after both map_free() and destroy() see the selem.
+ */
+ if (unlink == 2 ||
+ atomic_cmpxchg(&selem->state, SELEM_UNLINKED, SELEM_TOFREE) == SELEM_UNLINKED)
+ bpf_selem_free(selem, true);
+
+ if (free_storage)
+ bpf_local_storage_free(local_storage, true);
+}
+
void __bpf_local_storage_insert_cache(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
@@ -478,6 +576,7 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
storage->owner = owner;
storage->mem_charge = sizeof(*storage);
storage->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock;
+ refcount_set(&storage->owner_refcnt, 1);
bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(storage, first_selem);
@@ -746,6 +845,11 @@ void bpf_local_storage_destroy(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage)
if (free_storage)
bpf_local_storage_free(local_storage, true);
+
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&local_storage->owner_refcnt)) {
+ while (refcount_read(&local_storage->owner_refcnt))
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
}
u64 bpf_local_storage_map_mem_usage(const struct bpf_map *map)
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists