[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b1405cd-6c7f-4883-95fb-151cab223a68@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:47:27 +0100
From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
To: Michael Dege <michael.dege@...esas.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: renesas: rswitch: fix forwarding offload
statemachine
Hello Michael
> - } else if (rdev->forwarding_offloaded) {
> + } else if (rdev->forwarding_offloaded &&
> + !rdev->forwarding_requested) {
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
> }
Although indeed the condition in the current code is not correct, I'm not sure comfortable with this fix.
Full condition for a port to be a valid candidate for hardware forwarding is
rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested
It is not obvious if at this point rdev_for_l2_offload() could get changed from the last call to
rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(), so using only the partial condition at this point does not look good
for me.
I'd suggest to either change to something like
if (rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested && !rdev->forwarding_offloaded)
rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, true, false);
if (!(rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested) && rdev->forwarding_offloaded)
rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
Or maybe just
if (rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested)
rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, true, false);
else
rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
since rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading() has internal check for the current state and returns early if
the requested change is already applied.
Nikita
Powered by blists - more mailing lists