netdev - Re: [ANN] intel's netdev-ci for i40e

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260204174033.5aa7dc6a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:40:33 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Pielech, Adrian" <adrian.pielech@...el.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
 <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 <horms@...nel.org>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <krzysztof.galazka@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] intel's netdev-ci for i40e

On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:15:03 +0100 Pielech, Adrian wrote:
> On 2/4/2026 4:08 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Looks like the GRO test result parsing is off, the test cases are
> > reported as for example:
> > 
> > 	gro-test-lro-ipv6-ip-tos # XFAIL Device does not support...
> > 
> > Looks like this affects all your runners, I haven't noticed earlier.  
> 
> I have fixed that, XFAIL should be reported as fail even if further
> message suggests that the test should report SKIP due to "device does
> not support...".
> 
> Historical results were parsed again to remove test cases:
> "[...] # XFAIL [...]".

Looks good now, thanks!

One more note, the "driver metadata" is currently reported as:

{"devlink":{"driver":"i40e", ...

looks like you have some extra nests there. That's perfectly fine,
but we need there to be a "driver" key in the outmost object.
Right now our UIs show "undefined" for the drivers here:
https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/devices.html