[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYRlKk-cCIhqGWX7@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:38:50 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Joey Lu <a0987203069@...il.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, ychuang3@...oton.com, schung@...oton.com,
yclu4@...oton.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 3/3] net: stmmac: dwmac-nuvoton: Add dwmac
glue for Nuvoton MA35 family
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 09:40:05AM +0800, Joey Lu wrote:
> +
> +struct nvt_priv_data {
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
This looks to me like it's write-only, does it serve a useful purpose?
> + struct regmap *regmap;
This doesn't seem to be used outside of nvt_gmac_setup().
> +};
Given the above two comments, do you actually need struct nvt_priv_data ?
> +
> +static struct nvt_priv_data *
> +nvt_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct nvt_priv_data *bsp_priv;
> + phy_interface_t phy_mode;
> + u32 macid, arg, reg;
> + u32 tx_delay_step;
> + u32 rx_delay_step;
> + u32 miscr;
> +
> + bsp_priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bsp_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!bsp_priv)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + bsp_priv->regmap =
> + syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(dev->of_node, "nuvoton,sys", 1, &macid);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->regmap))
> + return ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bsp_priv->regmap),
> + "Failed to get sys register\n"));
> + if (macid > 1) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid sys arguments\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "tx-internal-delay-ps", &arg)) {
> + tx_delay_step = 0;
> + } else {
> + if (arg <= 2000) {
> + tx_delay_step = (arg == 2000) ? 0xf : (arg / NVT_PATH_DELAY_STEP);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Set Tx path delay to 0x%x\n", tx_delay_step);
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid Tx path delay argument.\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> + }
> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "rx-internal-delay-ps", &arg)) {
> + rx_delay_step = 0;
> + } else {
> + if (arg <= 2000) {
> + rx_delay_step = (arg == 2000) ? 0xf : (arg / NVT_PATH_DELAY_STEP);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Set Rx path delay to 0x%x\n", rx_delay_step);
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid Rx path delay argument.\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> + }
Each of these could be moved into a separate function:
static int nvt_gmac_get_delay(struct device *dev, const char *property)
{
u32 arg;
if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, property, &arg))
return 0;
if (arg > 2000) {
dev_err(dev, "Invalid %s argument.\n", property);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (arg == 2000)
return 15;
return arg / NVT_PATH_DELAY_STEP;
}
then:
int ret;
ret = nvt_gmac_get_delay(dev, "tx-internal-delay-ps");
if (ret < 0)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
tx_delay = ret;
ret = nvt_gmac_get_delay(dev, "rx-internal-delay-ps");
if (ret < 0)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
rx_delay = ret;
> +
> + miscr = (macid == 0) ? NVT_REG_SYS_GMAC0MISCR : NVT_REG_SYS_GMAC1MISCR;
> + regmap_read(bsp_priv->regmap, miscr, ®);
> + reg &= ~(NVT_TX_DELAY_MASK | NVT_RX_DELAY_MASK);
> +
> + if (of_get_phy_mode(pdev->dev.of_node, &phy_mode)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing phy mode property\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + switch (phy_mode) {
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
> + reg &= ~NVT_MISCR_RMII;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
> + reg |= NVT_MISCR_RMII;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported phy-mode (%d)\n", phy_mode);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + if (!(reg & NVT_MISCR_RMII)) {
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(NVT_TX_DELAY_MASK, tx_delay_step);
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(NVT_RX_DELAY_MASK, rx_delay_step);
You can move this inside the switch above under the RGMII case. Theses
delays are, after all, only for RGMII.
> + }
> +
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->regmap, miscr, reg);
Consider:
regmap_update_bits(bsp_priv->regmap, miscr,
NVT_TX_DELAY_MASK | NVT_RX_DELAY_MASK |
NVT_MISCR_RMII, reg);
> + plat_dat = devm_stmmac_probe_config_dt(pdev, stmmac_res.mac);
> + if (IS_ERR(plat_dat))
> + return PTR_ERR(plat_dat);
> +
> + /* Nuvoton DWMAC configs */
> + plat_dat->core_type = DWMAC_CORE_GMAC;
Is the hardware not compatible with any of the compatible types that
devm_stmmac_probe_config_dt() will automatically set this for you?
Which version of the core do you have?
> + plat_dat->tx_fifo_size = 2048;
> + plat_dat->rx_fifo_size = 4096;
There are tx-fifo-depth / rx-fifo-depth properties that can be used to
describe these in DT.
> + plat_dat->multicast_filter_bins = 0;
> + plat_dat->unicast_filter_entries = 8;
If this core is v3.50, v3.70 or v3.72, then there are
snps,multicast-filter-bins and snps,perfect-filter-entries which
can be used to describe both of these.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists