[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<177031321407.505259.5073683709420571661.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 17:40:14 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, kernel@...gutronix.de, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2026 10:37:59 +0000 you wrote:
> When looking at the iMX93 documentation, the definitions in the driver
> do not correspond with the documentation, which makes the driver
> confusing.
>
> The driver, for example, re-uses a definition for bit 0 for two
> different registers, where this bit have completely different purposes.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7e7fcfb0798a
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists