[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260204212334.72b392af@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:23:34 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, "Mark Bloch"
<mbloch@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Moshe
Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>, Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net/mlx5e: Report hw_gro_packets and
hw_gro_bytes netdev stats
On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:33:12 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> + stats->hw_gro_packets =
> + rq_stats->gro_packets + xskrq_stats->gro_packets;
> + stats->hw_gro_bytes = rq_stats->gro_bytes + xskrq_stats->gro_bytes;
Doesn't look right..
mlx5e_shampo_flush_skb(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe, bool match)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = rq->hw_gro_data->skb;
struct mlx5e_rq_stats *stats = rq->stats;
u16 gro_count = NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->count;
if (likely(skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags))
mlx5e_shampo_align_fragment(skb, rq->mpwqe.log_stride_sz);
if (gro_count > 1) {
stats->gro_skbs++;
stats->gro_packets += gro_count;
And:
-
name: rx-hw-gro-packets
doc: |
Number of packets that were coalesced from smaller packets by the
device. Counts only packets coalesced with the HW-GRO netdevice
feature, LRO-coalesced packets are not counted.
-
name: rx-hw-gro-wire-packets
doc: |
Number of packets that were coalesced to bigger packetss with the
HW-GRO netdevice feature. LRO-coalesced packets are not counted.
type: uint
Your gro_packets are "gro-wire-packets" and "gro-packets" are your
gro_skbs.
I really wish the AI was clever enough to catch uAPI mis-reading :(
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists