netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: sch_fq: rework fq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <177043802857.1183264.6214114625911512967.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 04:20:28 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
 jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: sch_fq: rework fq_gc() to avoid stack
 canary

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Wed,  4 Feb 2026 19:00:34 +0000 you wrote:
> Using kmem_cache_free_bulk() in fq_gc() was not optimal.
> 
> 1) It needs an array.
> 2) It is only saving cpu cycles for large batches.
> 
> The automatic array forces a stack canary, which is expensive.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net_sched: sch_fq: rework fq_gc() to avoid stack canary
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2214aab26811

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html