[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v7g8zv2o.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 11:50:23 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: i40e: Fix preempt count leak in napi poll tracepoint
Using get_cpu() in the tracepoint assignment causes an obvious preempt
count leak because nothing invokes put_cpu() to undo it:
softirq: huh, entered softirq 3 NET_RX with preempt_count 00000100, exited with 00000101?
This clearly has seen a lot of testing in the last 3+ years...
Use smp_processor_id() instead.
Fixes: 6d4d584a7ea8 ("i40e: Add i40e_napi_poll tracepoint")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_trace.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_trace.h
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i40e_napi_poll,
__entry->rx_clean_complete = rx_clean_complete;
__entry->tx_clean_complete = tx_clean_complete;
__entry->irq_num = q->irq_num;
- __entry->curr_cpu = get_cpu();
+ __entry->curr_cpu = smp_processor_id();
__assign_str(qname);
__assign_str(dev_name);
__assign_bitmask(irq_affinity, cpumask_bits(&q->affinity_mask),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists