[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260208160746.GD154003@shredder>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2026 18:07:46 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@...3.blue>
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 04/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active
state, IGMP/MLD querier appearance
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 03:52:10AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> +static void br_multicast_notify_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
> + bool ip4_active_old, bool ip6_active_old)
> +{
> + if (brmctx->ip4_active == ip4_active_old &&
> + brmctx->ip6_active == ip6_active_old)
> + return;
> +
> + br_info(brmctx->br, "mc_active changed, vid: %i: v4: %i->%i, v6: %i->%i\n",
> + brmctx->vlan ? brmctx->vlan->vid : -1,
> + ip4_active_old, brmctx->ip4_active,
> + ip6_active_old, brmctx->ip6_active);
Make this br_debug() to avoid spamming the kernel log?
I am aware that this can also be notified over netlink, but it will add
extra complexity and I am not sure anyone will use, so it might be best
to defer it for now.
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists