phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Archives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <512246C3.1030203@cs.rit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:20:35 -0500
From: Alan Kaminsky <ark@...rit.edu>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Archives

On 02/18/2013 03:48 AM, Larry Bugbee wrote:
> Not everybody will be monitoring all channels of communication.  Having too many channels will pretty much guarantee some important conversations will not get shared.  Is that what you want?

I second that. I do not use Twitter and I do not monitor IRC. The only 
discussion I will see or participate in is this mailing list. I think a lot of 
people from the academic side would say the same.

-- 
-Alan Kaminsky
  Professor
  Department of Computer Science
  B. Thomas Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences
  Rochester Institute of Technology