phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <400aacbe72584a619496592637f2c6ba@BY2PR03MB173.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 05:29:49 +0000
From: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

May I humbly suggest:

1.       In addition to links, we include the relevant code in the email archive whenever practical, and

2.       We try to minimize the abstraction in the code to communicate better

Tony your Ruby is beautiful, but I'm not 100% sure I understand what's going on. And it was only one major version ago that I considered myself a Ruby programmer! (i.e., six years)

-          Marsh

From: bascule@...il.com [mailto:bascule@...il.com] On Behalf Of Tony Arcieri
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 9:06 PM
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

This approach seemed fun to me and I'd like to know what problems it has. Disclaimer: I haven't read the scrypt paper. Perhaps I'm missing something... will read it when I have time.

https://gist.github.com/tarcieri/6171003

--
Tony Arcieri

Content of type "text/html" skipped