phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] C99 in reference implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52092663.4050909@dei.uc.pt>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:16:03 +0100
From: Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] C99 in reference implementations

On 12-08-2013 17:46, Mansour Moufid wrote:
>
> So for MSVC one can minimally replace the <stdint.h> header with:
>
>     typedef int i32;
>     typedef long long int i64;
>     typedef unsigned int u32;
>     typedef unsigned long long int u64;
>
>
MSVC >= 2010 does contain stdint.h. MSVC 2013 will have stdbool.h, mixed
declarations, compound literals, and designated initializers. Older MSVC
(at least as old as MSVC 6) contains the __intXX types, which are more
resilient to architecture changes. So:

#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1600
  typedef signed __int8 int8_t;
  ...etc
#else
#  include <stdint.h>
#endif