phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] C99 in reference implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6db77e837f2c420999a279356d55b20b@BY2PR03MB173.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 02:49:09 +0000
From: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] C99 in reference implementations

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Franke [mailto:dfoxfranke@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 7:33 PM
> 
> Everything below is fine by me, but how about <stdbool.h>?

I would avoid it. At least on its own it seems like a pretty trivial thing for which to drag in a whole C99 dependency.

But that's my personal bias from my (MSVC-heavy) experience.

- Marsh