| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:02:26 +0000
From: Peter Maxwell <peter@...icient.co.uk>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: Initial hashing function. Feedback welcome
On 2 January 2014 14:44, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> Running multiple copies of memmove shows my system seems to handle about
> 23GB/s of memory bandwidth. Two copies of keystretch achieve about 13GB/s.
> It's not maxing out memory bandwidth, but it's getting there...
>
​Surely you do not want to max-out memory bandwidth, that's more a problem
than a benefit is it not? For example, password checks are but a small
proportion of what an average web-server must do.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists