phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Proposed timeline changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFde23t6U-=W_8CJ9NYdG9VftN7JA7o_fNL_iDshywqJZzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 09:41:00 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Proposed timeline changes

We may be flexible if that is likely to benefit the project.

However we won't accept submissions after the initial deadline. And round 2
is about shortlisting a few submissions rather than receiving new ones. The
game has to have rules :)

What do other panel members think?
  On 1/4/2014 11:04 PM, Peter Maxwell wrote:

I think you'll be onto plums, Jean-Philippe Aumasson specifically said at
the end of November that the deadline wouldn't be changed

That was _so_ last November. Why do you have to bring up the past? :P

  Personally, I think the deadline is fine as it is: it's been advertised
for a year.

A year is not a very long time. Some people (not me, of course) only found
out about the competition a few months ago. Some people will not find out
about it until Monday. Maybe a year is not long enough. But maybe it is.

I personally would like to see it extended just because I haven't found any
time at all to work on my submission since October, and I'm really sweating
the deadline. Nov - Feb are extremely hectic for me, as I imagine they are
for many of you as well. I am strongly in favor of the revised timeline.

Content of type "text/html" skipped