phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Security concern for Catena

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52CB287D.2010501@uni-weimar.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:04:45 +0100
From: Christian Forler <christian.forler@...-weimar.de>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Security concern for Catena

On 06.01.2014 22:02, Steve Thomas wrote:
> I was about to implement Catena with 1/2 the memory and faster vs the
> reference implementation.

Cool. I'm eager to see the performance benchmarks of your
implementation. Please contact me after you finished the implementation.


> When I noticed a bug in the reference code https://github.com/cforler/catena/pull/3 
> Basically you are doing the work of LAMBDA but getting the security of
> LAMBDA-1. So Catena-3 is like Catena-2.

Oops! Thanks a lot, I owe you one.

Best regards,
Christian



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (552 bytes)